The Honey Browser Extension Scandal: What Every Business Needs to Know

PayPal's popular coupon extension has been exposed for hijacking affiliate commissions, collecting user data, and providing suboptimal deals. Here's what happened and what it means for your business.

Published 2026-02-02 by TechNet New England

If you've ever shopped online, you've probably seen the Honey browser extension advertised everywhere - from YouTube sponsorships to podcast ads. The extension, owned by PayPal since 2020, promised to automatically find coupon codes and save you money. But a December 2024 investigation revealed troubling practices that every business and consumer should understand.

What Happened

In December 2024, YouTuber MegaLag released an investigative video titled "Exposing the Honey Influencer Scam" that garnered over 13 million views within days. The investigation revealed that Honey wasn't just finding coupons - it was allegedly engaging in deceptive practices that hurt both content creators and consumers.

The Key Allegations

1. Affiliate Commission Hijacking

When you click a link from your favorite YouTuber or blogger to buy a product, that creator typically earns a small commission through affiliate tracking. The investigation found that Honey's extension would pop up at checkout and replace the creator's affiliate cookie with PayPal's own cookie - even when no coupon was found or applied.

This means:

2. Not Always the Best Deals

Despite claiming to find "the best" coupon codes, investigations revealed that Honey allegedly prioritizes codes from its partner merchants over codes that might save consumers more money. In some cases, better publicly-available codes were ignored in favor of partner-approved codes that benefited Honey's revenue share agreements.

3. Private Coupon Code Scraping

A follow-up investigation in December 2025 alleged that Honey scraped private coupon codes shared between users and businesses, adding them to their public database without permission. When businesses complained, Honey allegedly encouraged them to become paying partners rather than removing the codes.

4. Extensive Data Collection

The investigation revealed that Honey collects detailed user browsing and shopping data that goes beyond what's necessary for finding coupons. This data is valuable for PayPal's advertising and analytics businesses.

The Fallout

Legal Action

Over 20 class action lawsuits have been filed against PayPal, including one backed by YouTuber LegalEagle's law firm. The suits allege:

User Exodus

Honey lost approximately 3 million users within two weeks of the allegations going public. By the end of 2025, the extension had lost around 8 million of its 20 million users.

Industry Response

What This Means for Your Business

If You Run Affiliate Programs

Browser extensions like Honey can intercept your carefully cultivated affiliate relationships. Consider:

If You're a Content Creator

Your affiliate income may have been impacted without your knowledge. The class action lawsuits may provide recourse if you've lost commissions.

If You Use Browser Extensions

This scandal is a reminder to carefully evaluate what permissions browser extensions request. Extensions with broad access to your browsing data can:

Our Recommendations

  1. Audit your browser extensions - Remove any you don't actively use
  2. Check extension permissions - Be wary of extensions requesting access to "all websites"
  3. Consider the business model - If a service is free, you're likely the product
  4. Use official retailer apps - Many stores have their own apps with exclusive deals
  5. Manually search for codes - Sites like RetailMeNot don't require browser extensions

Honey's Response

Honey co-founder Ryan Hudson publicly denied that Honey is a scam and disputed MegaLag's key allegations. PayPal acknowledged certain code practices in January 2026 and announced they had been disabled. However, the numerous lawsuits continue to move forward.

The Bigger Picture

The Honey scandal highlights a broader issue with browser extensions and "free" services. When a company offers a free product, they need to monetize somehow. In Honey's case, the monetization allegedly came at the expense of content creators and potentially consumers who weren't getting the best deals.

As cybersecurity professionals, we encourage everyone to think critically about the tools they install and the permissions they grant. A few dollars in savings isn't worth compromising your privacy or supporting practices that harm the creator economy.

Sources